By Max Techera · Open-source (MIT) · Updated June 2026
Compare

ShareDuo vs drop

An honest head-to-head: where each fits, and why drop wins on open-source + own-infra.

npxnpx drops-cli report.html --managed

ShareDuo shares Claude artifacts with passwords and custom domains as a $4.99/mo SaaS; drop does it open-source, from the CLI/agents, with real client-side encryption.

ShareDuodrop
CLI / agent-native
Renders HTML / sites
Your own custom domain~
Zero-knowledge encryption
Your branding
Open-source / self-hosted
Price for the above$4.99/mofree

Who should use which

ShareDuo is browser-first with viewer analytics. drop is CLI/agent-native, zero-knowledge, and free on your own domain — better when you don't want client work on a vendor's servers.

FAQ

Is it really open-source and self-hosted?
Yes — MIT licensed, and it runs on your own Vercel Blob + domain. No third party ever holds your content (it's encrypted client-side) or controls your URL.
Is it zero-knowledge?
Locked drops are AES-256 encrypted in the browser via StatiCrypt before upload. The server stores only ciphertext — never your content or password.

Share what your AI builds — on your own domain.

Open-source, zero-knowledge, free. Try it in one command:

npx drops-cli report.html --managed