By Max Techera · Open-source (MIT) · Updated June 2026
Compare

Stacktree vs drop

An honest head-to-head: where each fits, and why drop wins on open-source + own-infra.

npxnpx drops-cli report.html --managed

Stacktree is a hosted, closed-source MCP publish primitive; drop is the open-source, self-hosted equivalent.

Stacktreedrop
CLI / agent-native
Renders HTML / sites
Your own custom domain~
Zero-knowledge encryption
Your branding
Open-source / self-hosted
Price for the above$8–19/mofree

Who should use which

Use Stacktree if you want a fully managed service and don't mind closed-source hosting + a subscription, and you need stateful extras (server-enforced burn-after-read, per-viewer gating) today.

Use drop if you want to own the stack — MIT source, your Vercel Blob, your domain, free — with branding built in and the same MCP/CLI ergonomics. drop's managed tier matches Stacktree's zero-setup start.

FAQ

Is it really open-source and self-hosted?
Yes — MIT licensed, and it runs on your own Vercel Blob + domain. No third party ever holds your content (it's encrypted client-side) or controls your URL.
Is it zero-knowledge?
Locked drops are AES-256 encrypted in the browser via StatiCrypt before upload. The server stores only ciphertext — never your content or password.

Share what your AI builds — on your own domain.

Open-source, zero-knowledge, free. Try it in one command:

npx drops-cli report.html --managed