By Max Techera · Open-source (MIT) · Updated June 2026
Blog

Self-hosted vs. hosted artifact sharing: which should you use?

Hosted tools (Stacktree, ShareDuo, Send) are fast to start but own your URL and your data. Self-hosting keeps both. Here's the honest tradeoff.

npxnpx drops-cli report.html --managed

Sharing what AI builds splits into two camps: hosted SaaS, and self-hosted/open-source. The right choice depends on who needs to own the URL, the data, and the bill.

When hosted wins

Zero ops, instant start, and stateful extras (per-viewer analytics, server-enforced burn-after-read). If you don't mind your content on a vendor's servers and a monthly fee, hosted is fine.

When self-hosted wins

Client work, sensitive content, your own brand/domain, no recurring cost, and auditability. drop gives you a hosted-grade UX (one command, managed tier to start) while everything runs on your Vercel and stays zero-knowledge.

FAQ

Can I have both?
Yes — drop's managed tier is zero-setup to start; move to your own domain with `drop deploy` whenever you want. Same CLI either way.
Is it really open-source and self-hosted?
Yes — MIT licensed, and it runs on your own Vercel Blob + domain. No third party ever holds your content (it's encrypted client-side) or controls your URL.

Share what your AI builds — on your own domain.

Open-source, zero-knowledge, free. Try it in one command:

npx drops-cli report.html --managed